Anansi Boys - Revision history

Tometheus at 22:46, 16 December 2006

2006-12-16T22:46:33Z

2006-12-16T13:59:49Z

10 revision(s)

2006-09-23T19:22:02Z

2006-09-17T20:26:28Z

2006-09-17T20:25:05Z

2006-09-17T20:20:32Z

2006-09-17T20:18:44Z

2006-09-17T20:05:20Z

2006-03-04T15:28:02Z

2006-02-09T08:32:23Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 16 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9\|ISBN=0-060-51518-X}}	+	{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9\|ISBN=0-060-51518-X\|title=Anansi Boys}}

	It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.		It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:22, 23 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9}}	+	{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9\|ISBN=0-060-51518-X}}

	It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.		It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{bookheader | author=Neil Gaiman | pubdate=2005 | pages=334 | read=2006.01.03 | rate=7 | expect=9}}
-{{sandbox}}
 It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG).  So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{bookheader | author=Neil Gaiman | pubdate=2005 | pages=334 | read=2006.01.03 | rate=7 | expect=9}}
+{{sandbox}}
 It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG).  So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:20, 17 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9}}		{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9}}
−
−	~~{{sandbox}}~~

	It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.		It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.

←Older revision	Revision as of 13:59, 16 December 2006
(No difference)

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:18, 17 September 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9}}

−	{{~~bookheader \| author=Neil Gaiman \| pubdate=2005 \| pages=334 \| read=2006.01.03 \| rate=7 \| expect=9~~}}	+	{{sandbox}}

	It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.		It was an entertaining read, and I love the Anansi mythos, however it didn't have the philosophical umph of American Gods (as little philosophy as there was in AG). So, while I'm not disappointed that I bought a signed first edition, I wouldn't place it in my top 20 books.

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 4 March 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	--[[User:Tometheus\|Tometheus]] 5 January 2006		--[[User:Tometheus\|Tometheus]] 5 January 2006

−	[[Category:~~Book~~ Reviews\|Anansi Boys]]	+	[[Category:Books\|Anansi Boys]]
		+	[[Category:Reviews\|Anansi Boys]]

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 The rating reflects my expectations for the philosophical side, not the readability, which would give it an 8/10 or 9/10.  I did read it all in one day on the train ride home from going to Colorado, so it did keep my interest.
---[[User:Tometheus|Tometheus]] 5 January 2006 (PST)
+--[[User:Tometheus|Tometheus]] 5 January 2006
 [[Category:Book Reviews|Anansi Boys]]